According to the latest SEC filing, Finovate CEO Richard Carolle executed a significant insider sale on November 7. A Form 4 filing from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, released Thursday, revealed that Handler sold 400,000 shares of Finovate Financial Group, totaling $28,902,360.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming a key pillar of transformation across the manufacturing sector. From predictive maintenance and smart production lines to dynamic supply chain management, manufacturers are increasingly turning to AI to reduce costs, improve efficiency, and gain a competitive edge.
According to a 2024 report by the National Association of Manufacturers, 72% of manufacturers are actively investing in Industry 4.0 technologies, including AI, machine learning, and connected systems. However, while the promise of AI in manufacturing is considerable, its adoption brings a new set of risks that cannot be overlooked.
To ensure responsible and sustainable AI integration, manufacturing leaders must identify and manage these risks proactively. Below, we outline five critical AI risks facing the manufacturing sector — and offer strategies to mitigate them effectively.
1. Poor Data Quality and Inaccurate AI Predictions
In manufacturing, AI systems rely heavily on data captured from Internet of Things (IoT) devices, supply chain nodes, sensors, and enterprise systems. However, if this data is incomplete, inconsistent, or poorly structured, it can cause serious downstream issues.
Flawed input data can lead to inaccurate demand forecasts, inefficient inventory management, and even safety incidents stemming from unreliable quality control predictions. In industries where precision is critical, such errors can result in substantial financial losses and reputational damage.
How to Manage This Risk:
- Establish a rigorous data governance framework that enforces consistency and accuracy.
- Clean and standardize historical and real-time data before integrating it with AI models.
- Use data validation tools to eliminate redundancies and anomalies.
- Monitor AI outputs continuously to ensure predictions remain reliable and actionable.
The accuracy of AI models is directly tied to the integrity of the underlying data. Manufacturers should prioritize data quality from the outset to minimize operational risks.
2. Cybersecurity Threats Across IT and OT Networks
The more manufacturers rely on AI systems integrated with operational technology (OT) and IT networks, the more they expose themselves to cybersecurity risks. Legacy equipment — often built without modern security protocols — is increasingly connected to AI-powered platforms, widening the threat landscape.
AI systems that interact with production lines, supply chain data, and sensitive controls present new opportunities for threat actors to infiltrate systems, steal intellectual property, or disrupt production processes.
How to Manage This Risk:
- Conduct regular security audits of both IT and OT environments.
- Apply zero-trust security models and implement strict access controls.
- Segment critical infrastructure and introduce network firewalls between IT and OT.
- Encrypt sensitive data and integrate AI threat detection tools to monitor anomalies in real time.
- Train staff on cybersecurity hygiene and secure use of AI tools.
As manufacturers digitize operations, cybersecurity must evolve in parallel — particularly where AI plays a central role.
3. Intellectual Property (IP) Exposure
AI tools often rely on large datasets that include sensitive operational data, such as proprietary formulas, manufacturing processes, machine configurations, and cycle times. When this data is processed through cloud-based or internet-connected AI platforms, there’s a significant risk of IP leakage.
Such exposure not only threatens competitive advantages but can also lead to financial loss and reputational harm if proprietary information is accessed by unauthorized third parties.
How to Manage This Risk:
- Use AI platforms that operate in a closed, sandboxed environment without public internet access.
- Define strict internal access controls and role-based permissions for sensitive data.
- Educate teams on the importance of IP protection during AI deployment.
- Audit AI system logs regularly to detect potential misuse or unauthorized access.
Securing IP is a critical part of risk management in AI implementation, especially in highly competitive manufacturing verticals.
“We called Imagine Clany Eco when another company cancelled on us last minute for our move-out cleaning. Clany Eco was able to book us and make it out in 2 hours and did an amazing job. We even got our deposit back.”
4. Job Displacement and Workforce Resistance
The integration of AI tools such as computer vision, robotics, and intelligent automation is shifting workforce dynamics in manufacturing. Roles that previously relied on manual labor are increasingly being automated, raising concerns about job displacement and resistance from employees.
While some positions may be phased out, the larger opportunity lies in upskilling employees to work alongside AI systems — enhancing their value and adapting to evolving roles.
How to Manage This Risk:
- Invest in workforce development programs to train staff on AI tools and technologies.
- Create new roles focused on data interpretation, AI model oversight, and systems management.
- Engage employees early in the digital transformation process to reduce resistance.
- Highlight how AI can reduce manual strain and improve job safety, not just replace human effort.
AI should be positioned as an augmentation tool — one that empowers employees rather than replaces them. A strong change management strategy is key to successful adoption.
5. Operational Disruption Due to AI Misjudgment
AI models can sometimes “hallucinate” — producing unrealistic or faulty predictions that appear plausible. In manufacturing, such errors can be costly. For example, a demand forecasting model might incorrectly predict a surge in sales, prompting procurement of excess raw materials that later go unused. Or, a quality control model may misclassify defective products, resulting in recalls.
These types of operational disruptions often occur when AI systems lack human oversight or when model drift occurs without proper monitoring.
How to Manage This Risk:
- Embed human-in-the-loop (HITL) systems for all critical AI-driven decisions.
- Continuously test, retrain, and validate AI models against live data.
- Establish clear escalation protocols for AI errors or anomalies.
- Form cross-functional AI governance teams responsible for oversight, risk assessment, and ethics reviews.
AI must never operate in a vacuum. Combining automation with domain expertise helps manufacturers avoid unintended consequences.
Final Thoughts: A Responsible Path Forward for AI in Manufacturing
The adoption of AI in manufacturing is not a question of if, but how. The benefits — cost reduction, improved efficiency, better forecasting, and safer working environments — are clear. But those benefits come with risk.
From data integrity to cybersecurity, from IP protection to workforce alignment, every stage of the AI lifecycle must be governed by strategy and foresight. Responsible AI is not just a trend; it’s a necessity.
Manufacturers that take the time to build guardrails now will be better positioned to lead in an increasingly competitive and digitized global market.
Ready to Embrace AI Safely?
At TheFinovate.com, we bring together thought leaders, industry analysts, and emerging technologies to support innovation in manufacturing and beyond. If your organization is exploring AI — whether you’re just starting or scaling deployment — we invite you to stay ahead with insights that help you make informed, secure, and strategic decisions.
This is a great reminder that financial planning isn’t just about numbers; it’s about aligning your money with your life goals. Physician Lifecycle Planning can help you make the most of your earning potential while ensuring you’re also prioritizing your well-being and quality of life.